![]() Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here.We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.Please take personal conversations off this forum.Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**.Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous.Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. ![]() We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind. Sixth Circuit panel concludes Michigan sex offender registration amendments “imposes punishment” and thus are ex post unconstitutional for retroactive application ![]() Full Articleįederal Appeals Court Calls Michigan Sex Offender Registry “A Punishment,” Bars State from Imposing Draconian Restrictions (ACLU Michigan – including related documents) Among other things, the plaintiffs argued that amendments to Michigan’s SORA increased the severity of its requirements after their convictions imposed retroactive punishment. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit held that recent amendments to Michigan’s Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) are unconstitutional because they impose retroactive punishment on sex offenders in violation of the Constitution’s prohibition on ex post facto laws. UPDATED with media links – Today the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |